the investment. Art would have been second. I also picked Austen,
because she seemed like the most fun/entertaining dining companion on
offer in the list. Ten million dollars would induce me to fake
religious piety a couple of hours a week--as Gene said, 10 million is
a life-changing figure. And I'd take the ten years. Just seems logical.
--- In [email protected], "lovett1979"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I submitted three and Gene used two of them. Unfortunately, his
> response to both was that I was a total idiot (which is usually his
> response to my posts anyway) but it was still cool.
>
> Of course, the one that he didn't choose was the one where I saw
> funny. It was in reference to the last poll question and I said
> (something like):
>
> "I've rethought my answer to the last poll question. I had said that
> I wouldn't change my religion (atheist) to anything for any amount of
> money. But, I'm a professional singer and every week I get paid to go
> to temples and churches and participate in the services. So,
> apparently I would change, and for only about $90 a week."
>
> I was also explaining why I wanted to have dinner with Jesus. My
> posts that did make it were asking WHY women wanted to buy a $2
> million piece of art (I still don't agree with that answer) and the
> Dave Barry quote about sending things back in restaurants.
>
SPONSORED LINKS
| Identity | Flag | Guessing |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "weingartenchatters" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
