<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I challenge the WCers to come up with something, anything, more
> > saccharine than a fake oil painting of an angel kissing a kitty.
>
> A-hem.
>
> Attempt Uno:
>
> http://www.myspace.com/encouragementkitten
>
> Attempt Dos:
>
> http://mfrost.typepad.com/cute_overload/
>
> May the vomit be with you.
>
> ~~Tracy
>
I have already declared, in a previous message, that the Cute
Overload site is not barfalicious enough to beat the angel-kissing-a-
kitty. The Encouragement Kitten, however, is a serious contender
(particularly given the twinkly pink animated background. Not to
mention the *soundtrack*).
The conclusion I am drawing, based on the evidence presented so far
(three whole websites), is that Cute Little Animals generally are
not, in and of themselves, nauseating. No, human intervention
and/or embellishment is necessary in order to raise an animal's
Cuteness Quotient into the stratosphere of Truly Puke-Inducing.
SPONSORED LINKS
| Identity | Flag | Guessing |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "weingartenchatters" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
