yes except I said "much to loose," which doesn't really make sense. I think I was thinking it was spelled like "choose" since it is pronounced almost the same. What's up with the English language? Why are "chose" and "lose" pronounced so differently? Why does "choose" rhyme with "lose" and not "loose"? I'll never understand.
--- In [email protected], "Ray Bradley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think anybody who listened to Bill Hicks' comedy knows that works > quite well as "too loose." > > - Ray Bradley > > -- In [email protected], "Ellen" <ellengoodman6@> > wrote: > > > > ah yes, that would be "much to lose", not "loose". Sorry about that, > I > > was a little out of it last night. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "areofilm" <areofilm@> > > wrote: > > > > > > For 65 cents I expect it to be much too loose. > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/weingartenchatters/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
