yeah, pretty much what I was trying to say, obviously not very clearly, and I'm the first to admit I used "prove" incorrectly. So I think OJ is guilty. So what? However of course it matters if you're on the jury.
--- In [email protected], "Roberta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not looking to stir the recent pot about guilt or innocence sans trial, but just got the word (via Fox News) that someone has been arrested in subject 10-year-old murder case. They put on Greta Van Sustern, who rambled on at length about the history of the investigation and repeatedly made the point (?) that several issues had caused a lot of people to think...(whatever). Talk about the court of public opinion - and this has long been a peeve of mine - in situations like this what possible difference does it make what the public 'thinks' about it? It's not like a popularity poll has any bearing, or the thoughts have any value or carry any weight. To borrow a well-loved line from a long-forgotten movie, "Opinions are like assholes - everybody has one." > > Thanks. Just needed to vent a bit. > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/weingartenchatters/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
