ok this is getting to the point of TMI (too much information). But thanks for sharing. I guess some people might think it is not worth the effort, I can see that. But I don't think I would feel any more vulnerable getting undressed in the stall to switch my underwear than I already am just to use the bathroom, but that's just me.
--- In [email protected], "Daria Akers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ellen, > I don't get half undressed to pee. I drop my pants to my knees, pull > down my panties and sit. At they point I notice that the seams are the > wrong way and laugh because my panties are inside out. I am not even a > 1/4 undressed. I don't fix it because it would require me to remove my > shoes, my pants, my underwear and then turn them inside out, put the > panties back on, pants back on shoes back on. The whole time feeling > VERY vulnerable. I wear tennis shoes or crocs at work. the tennis > shoes are a pain to take off and put back on... The one time I have > corrected the inside out situation I was wearing crocs and it was > easier (not only were they inside out they were back to front and I > have been getting a wedgie all day so it was worth fixing.) > Ok maybe I don't get dressed in the dark... I just don't pay > attention. I am up, showered, dressed and out the door with my 4 year > old in less than an hour in the morning. There is a ritual involving > underwear in our household. I let Lesley pick my panties. She is given > a choice of 3 panties and picks what she wants me to wear. If they > have a pattern I never put them on inside out .. .very obvious. > However if they are a solid color I sometimes miss that they are > inside out. I would much rather pay attention to Lou Lou than my > panties. I also don't fold my undies... They are cotton briefs not > thongs because why wear anything if only wearing a string. They are > dumped in a drawer with little to not rhyme or reason (sometimes they > even change the drawer that they are stored in depending on who puts > away the laundry). > As for the developer thing... I am a techie and assume everyone else > is the world is one too. I guess you makes assumptions too. I work > with a bunch of SOFTWARE developers not real estate developers. When I > posed the what do I mean by developer to my husband (a fellow techie) > - he looked at me like I was stupid then said person who writes code. > I asked if he ever thought "person who builds buildings" and he said > NEVER. No on our radar. > Different frames of reference. > Daria > > > On 10/11/06, Ellen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can't you just fix it in the bathroom since presumably you're getting > > halfway undressed anyway? Do you really get up that much earlier than > > your husband that you have to get dressed in the dark? I think I > > would change in the bathroom if I were in that situation. I know if I > > was asleep and someone turned on the light it would wake me up too. > > You said in a previous email that you were in an argument with a > > developer or something like that. At first I thought you meant real > > estate developer, not software developer. Like a developer was trying > > to build on some land that the community wanted to leave as a park or > > something like that. Big difference between software developer and > > real estate developer. If someone says they are a developer, I > > assume they mean real estate developer, not software developer. > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/weingartenchatters/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/weingartenchatters/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
