Maybe one of those butt clench detectors would see you through this difficult time.
--- In [email protected], "Ellen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree 100%. I just meant as a bandaid solution for these 5 months > substitute hosts and less prep would be better than nothing. > > --- In [email protected], "maxshenk" > <brianmargo67@> wrote: > > > > > > I like all of the Post chatters but if you think about it, really, > Gene > > and Hax are in a league of their own when it comes to the quality of > > their chats and the energy and time they put into them. Gene > obviously > > does a lot of work on it before noon Tuesdays (I mean, sniffle > sniffle, > > "DID"); he always is not only prompt but goes online with a LONG > > introduction; plus he writes some answers to posts before the chat > even > > starts; plus who else UPDATES? > > > > Meanwhile, Hax regularly goes two hours, 2:15, 2:30... some of the > > writers who do those chats barely do their hour and they're gone. > > > > There isn't much I'd gladly pay for on the internet, but I would > pay to > > subscribe to the POST online, and Gene and Hax are two big reasons. > > > > Why isn't LIZ filling in for him? > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ellen" <ellengoodman6@> > > wrote: > > > > > > He should have substitute hosts. A different one each week. What a > > > great gig. Internal Post people, external local or not so local > > > celebrities, the general public--have a contest to see who is the > > > biggest Gene fan and the winner gets to host the chat, etc. etc. > > > It's only an hour. No poll, no CPOW if the host doesn't want to, > > > almost no prep--just take questions and answer them. Gene is > > > obsessive. You don't need to prepare 10 hours or whatever it is > for > > > a 1 hour chat. We'd love him anyway. More power to him that he's > > > that dedicated, but a likely result of all that work is burnout. > > > It's awesome that he and Dave are working on a movie together, > > > though. Can't wait to see it! > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ray Bradley" > > > clavenia@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Yeah we should. Big get together. Plan it now. No last minute > crap. > > > > > > > > Or, we could do our own chat. Maybe WaPo.com could give one of > us > > > > a "Gene for a Week" thing. > > > > > > > > I'll see what we could use as a PsuedoGene... > > > > > > > > - Ray > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we need to plan a bang-up WC in-person get-together > for > > > > > sometime within the next month or so, and demand that Gene > join > > > us. > > > > > It's the least he can do, after abandoning us. And so close to > > > > > Festivus, too. (At least he gave us a major grievance to > > > air . . .) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
