Well, ya see, cloning is really the key word. Therefore, it is a word I used in the subject line. You may have been confused by the pun.
Ya see, the FDA yesterday approved cloned animals for our food supply, so theoretically, you could be eating the same cow over and over again. But cow was just not funny enough for me (and it is a sensitive issue for Stephanie), so I applied this concept to the California condor, an endangered species that is not even in our food supply, and would probably be sinewy, bony, and feathery anyway. So the thought of eating California condors for the rest of my life. Oh, nevermind. You don't listen to a lot of Frank Zappa eh? But if I can mail off this old, dried, crusty piece of cat poop and get my old Spooky back, it would all be worth it. Ya see, there's DNA in poop I guess. I am not a scientist but I think they use DNA when cloning stuff. I hope that clears everything up. --- In [email protected], "Ellen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This may be what Daria didn't understand, as I didn't either. Just a > guess--can't speak for her (obviously), but I wasn't sure what issue > you were of two minds on. I wasn't sure what producing another kitty > has to do with eating a California condor. Is this in response to an > article in the Post? > > --- In [email protected], "James" <ttlsccr@> wrote: > > > > Are there any carnivores left here? Or at least a couple of wayward > > omnivores? Or have we all been systematically eliminated along with > > the humor? Anyway, I'm of two minds on the issue. While I'd love to > > be able to produce another Spooky kitty from an old piece of poop > > found behind the sofa, I think that once I eat a California condor, > my > > work there should be done. > > > > Rock on with yer bad ass pagan selves. > > >
