right, you can't make up stuff like that.

--- In [email protected], "Maureen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> what i find funny is that i don't doubt, for one second, that you 
> ACTUALLY did this IRL...  
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Ray Bradley" 
> <clavenia@> wrote:
> >
> > Since we're still stuck in the winter of our discontent, our Dark 
> Age 
> > before the Dawning of the New Light of Our Beloved Gene, I have 
> > decided to take forth the reins of hilarity and Channel Gene with 
> a 
> > Just Inside The Beltway column. 
> > 
> > Essentially, I shall rewrite a classic Gene column and show what 
> > would happen if everybody's favorite middle aged culturally 
Jewish 
> > humor writer from New York had been replaced with, well, me. A 
> > bonafide Maryland mutt with no real moral compass or the 
> complusion 
> > to do anything about it. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Ray's Close Shave
> > The adventures of a not-so-smooth operator
> > 
> > Originally done By Gene Weingarten
> > Sunday, June 25, 2006; Page W40
> > 
> > 
> > The question that we columnists hear most frequently is: "Do you 
> use 
> > water when you bathe, or just an ungodly amount of Axe deoderant 
> > spray?" It's a stupid question, because I'm almost 34, and 
> everybody 
> > knows that only socially-awkward 15 year old boys use Axe because 
> > they're too young to get Drakkar (that's for the 18 year olds). 
So 
> I 
> > generally ask people to rephrase it using proper grammar, which 
> they 
> > do: "Have you ever groomed yourself, assface?"
> > 
> > Today, I will end the unpleasantness with a straight answer. We 
> > columnists do our grooming in many ways: applying creams, scented 
> > lotions, attaching various vibrating devices to appendages that 
> can 
> > be found at MVC, 5625 Leesburg Pike, Bailey's Crossroads, Falls 
> > Church Virginia, by writing things for bored humor enthusiasts 
who 
> > can't wait for a real humor writer to come back.
> >  
> > This column is a case in point. I got the idea from a gifted 
> writer 
> > named Gene Weingarten who stole this idea from some kid named 
> Danny 
> > Jacobs, who asked Gene for his opinion of a humor piece he had 
> done 
> > for his college paper at the University of Maryland. Gene said it 
> was 
> > swell. Then Gene stole it. Now I'm rewriting it. This is all part 
> of 
> > my personal program to shame humor columnists to participate in 
> chats 
> > again. Gene stole the article to acquaint young journalists with 
> > important truths. In this case: Beware, there are vultures 
> everywhere.
> > 
> > For his article, Danny shaved one half of his face with a new, 
> super-
> > hyped five-blade razor, the other half with his trusty electric, 
> and 
> > then had fellow students feel which shave was closer. (The 
blade.) 
> It 
> > occurred to Gene that in the hands of a pro such as himself, this 
> > idea would present an important journalistic opportunity to ask 
> women 
> > he did not know to stroke my face. Since I'm at least 35% more 
> > perverted than Gene, I figured this would be fine excuse to get 
> women 
> > to cop a feel of my supple buttocks. 
> > 
> > Plus, I have a great ass. For the past 2 years -- to the derision 
> of 
> > my family and friends -- I have been riding my bicycle to and 
from 
> > work on a heavy steel mountain bike from 1994. No sane person has 
> > used a mountain bike this heavy since the era of carbon fiber 
> > composites and titanium alloys; barring of course the waves of 
> recent 
> > immigrants who ride similar bikes to and from their jobs at the 
> > Jerry's Subs and Pizza. I ride this way because I think it's cool 
> to 
> > ride a bike twice a day with something that weighs as much, 
> > practically, than an Olson Twin. But that's really a bad simile, 
> so I 
> > tell people I do it because the heavier bike and fatter tires 
give 
> me 
> > a better work out. Here was an opportunity to discover whether 
all 
> > this bike riding might actually be making my ass *too* good.
> > 
> > I rode into work yesterday using my heavy bike to get to work, 
> only 
> > using my left leg to pedal. Today, I used my lightweight racing 
> bike 
> > using only might right leg. In the interest of science, I am now 
> > about to go out in the food court and ask 30 women to judge the 
> > results. Hang on.
> > 
> > Okay, I'm back. I am pleased to report that all but three agreed 
> to 
> > participate. One of these turndowns, however, did not go well at 
> all. 
> > She listened patiently to my proposal and then wordlessly began 
to 
> > run/walk away in the direction of the Pentagon's police staff, a 
> > group of anti-terrorism specialists with submachine guns. 
> Mustering 
> > as much dignity as possible, I headed away, slowly but 
> purposefully, 
> > in the opposite direction.
> > 
> > Another turndown went like this:
> > 
> > Pam: Are you asking only women?
> > 
> > Me: Well . . . yes.
> > 
> > Pam: Why?
> > 
> > Me:
> > 
> > Pam: I'll do it if you get a man to do it first.
> > 
> > So I guess, in that case, it was actually I who declined.
> >   
> > Most women seemed to take this diagnostic task very seriously. 
> > Several checked with the backs of their hands, like a mom testing 
> for 
> > fever. Philosophically, the experience was intriguing -- a 
> metaphor 
> > for the uncertainty of romance. The mechanics of a caress aren't 
> all 
> > that different from those of a slap; it's mostly a matter of 
> emphasis.
> > 
> > At the Citibank ATM, I explained to a woman named Christianne 
what 
> I 
> > wanted her to do, and she asked: "You mean . . . with my hand?" I 
> > stammered the first thing that came into my head: "Well, with 
> > whatever you think appropriate." She did it anyway.
> > 
> > There were scary moments. One young woman named Carole heard my 
> > pitch, and, stony-faced, immediately reached into her pocketbook 
> > (mace?) and produced a business card (lawsuit?). Fortunately, she 
> > just rubbed the edge of the card against my cheeks, listening for 
> > differences in the scratching sound. "Disappointed I didn't use 
my 
> > palm?" Carole asked. "No!" I lied.
> > 
> > Now I know what you are thinking: You are thinking that only a 
> > perverted man would derive some sort of pleasure from this tiny, 
> > silly degree of anonymous intimacy. And I'd have to say you were 
> > right. I am completely ashamed of myself.
> > 
> > The final tally: Thirteen said the left side of my butt was 
> firmer. 
> > Thirteen said the right side was smoother. One could not decide.
> > 
> > In short, I may have to do it again. For science.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ***************************************************************
> >
>


Reply via email to