right so I thought the fact that she works for Gonzales or whoever has no bearing on whether her political views jive or not with Gene's. I'm guessing they do, and it's just a job, one she may not like as much with her current and immediate past boss in office. She is apparently very good at what she does. They met when they were both journalists in Albany or some such, and somehow the rib ended up as a lawyer. Guess she went to law school somwhere along the line. Wonder if they moved to DC for her job, otherwise they would have stayed in Miami? Hmmmm. (yes I know I say that a lot--it's shorthand for "inquiring minds want to know".)
--- In [email protected], "Daria Akers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are appointed people in the Department of Justice and there are long > time people. I thought that she was a long timer who can't be tossed on her > butt for her political leanings. > > On 10/31/07, Ellen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So does Gene's wife work for the other side? I get the impression she > > works for the atty gen office, who happens to be a republican because > > the prez is republican. It's hard to say what she actually BELIEVES > > based on just that she works for the atty gen office. Anyone know > > more about this? > > --- In [email protected], "areofilm" <areofilm@> > > wrote: > > > > > > My current S.O. thought I was a Republican the first time we met and I > > > said, I'm probably more of a Libertarian than a Republican. She did > > > research and came up with talking points for our first date. So after > > > i snowed her over i won her over with my winning smile and personality. > > > > > > She won't miss a chance to badmouth a "Republican". When I told her > > > there are nice people who are socially liberal but politically > > > Republicans she said that even if they were, she couldn't stand anyone > > > who would align themselves under that party. > > > > > > Life's too short to be concerned about what party the guy across the > > > office or in the car next to you is. > > > > > > And as far as not dating someone just because they work for the other > > > side, well, i wouldn't take it that seriously unless they've made it > > > their life's work. We've all done jobs we hate to make a buck. To > > > paraphrase one of my life's motto's. > > > > > > "Everyone sucks money's c*ck" > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ray Bradley" > > > <clavenia@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I got a kick out of the question from the young woman who wasn't > > going > > > > to date a Republican. We've been talking about this at work, and > > while > > > > both laughing at and trying to defend her statements, a bigger > > question > > > > came up: > > > > > > > > what REALLY are the differences between the Republicans and Democrats > > > > anymore? > > > > > > > > The lines are so blurred anymore - none of the major Democratic > > > > candidates are saying they want an immediate troop withdrawal from > > > > Iraq, all Dems and Repubs are hemming and hawing about Iran, nobody > > > > seems to have a cohesive tax policy. Lots of bloggers and columnists > > > > have pointed out that Giuliani and Clinton share views on many of the > > > > major issues. All candidates are talking about alternative fuels and > > > > tax breaks for ultra-efficient vehicles. Everybody wants better > > > > schools, nobody's taking shots at No Child Left Behind and the > > only two > > > > guys consistently shooting straight answers anymore - Dennis Kucinich > > > > and Ron Paul - are merely afterthoughts. > > > > > > > > About the one constant is that *most* Republicans are against > > abortion, > > > > and *most* Democrats support a woman's choice. That's about it. Every > > > > other issue is completely blurred. > > > > > > > > Or has the country been geared towards Republican vs. Democrat for so > > > > long that the parties have failed to see where the lines have been > > > > drawn? > > > > > > > > - Ray > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > >
