On 18 Nov 2010, at 16:50, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Pete Muir wrote:
>> Hi Scott
>>
>> From the spec,
>>
>> "The event object must be of type
>> javax.enterprise.inject.spi.ProcessObserverMethod<T, X>, where T is the bean
>> class of the bean that declares the observer method and X is the observed
>> event type of the observer method.
>>
>> public interface ProcessObserverMethod<T, X> {
>> public AnnotatedParameter<T> getAnnotatedEventParameter();
>> public ObserverMethod<X> getObserverMethod();
>> public void addDefinitionError(Throwable t);
>> }
>> "
>>
>> It looks like this has got completely wrong against the javadoc and
>> signatures released with the spec, I will go to the EE CTS guys and see what
>> the best path forward is, however I suspect it is unfixable until we do a
>> MR. I will also go back in and fix this test so that it works correctly
>> against the API as defined in the javadoc.
>>
>
> Thanks Pete.
>
> I'd checked against the latest API and Weld but both were using the
> javadoc not the spec, so I wasn't sure which way the changes were going.
> So it's basically the same issue as the IF_EXISTS attribute name.
Right, and the Java EE CTS team at Oracle were very clear that the javadoc
takes precedence over the spec in this case (which I think is totally the wrong
approach, for me the spec is canonical).
Scott, could you file a CDI issue so that we don't loose track of this?
Thanks, and apologies for the screw up!
Pete
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
