My bad, sorry. -Clint
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:14 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > As I said, jsf will still be entirely optional, it's just we will no longer > support jsf 1.2 > > Pete Muir > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete > > On 2 Dec 2010, at 17:11, Clint Popetz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Pete Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> AFACIT this will really force Tomcat etc. users to use JSF2... >>>> >>> >>> Yep. I think this is a matter of us leaving the fence and deciding that we >>> are going to advocate the EE 6 technology stack as a baseline. We are >>> recommending a new programming model, after all, so I think it's consistent >>> to select the optimal compliments. I've was thinking along the same lines >>> for Seam Servlet...we should really be assuming we have Servlet 3, or at the >>> very least the Servlet-CDI integration (which Weld Servlet patches in). >>> Otherwise, we sort of look hesitant in our message to adopt EE 6. So I'm all >>> for it. >> >> Yuck. >> >> -Clint >> >> (Loves CDI, uses wicket, deploys a large app on a cluster of 30 tomcat >> instances, doesn't want a needless jsf dependency.) >> >> >> >>> -Dan >>> >>> -- >>> Dan Allen >>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action >>> Registered Linux User #231597 >>> >>> http://mojavelinux.com >>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> weld-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Clint Popetz >> http://42lines.net >> Scalable Web Application Development > -- Clint Popetz http://42lines.net Scalable Web Application Development _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
