That is basically what's happening. The only difference is that the new master branch will not appear immediately but sometime in June. I someone happens to miss this info and do a pull on their master branch in the meantime, a missing remote branch will be less confusing than a huge conflict.
On 05/23/2013 01:39 PM, Stuart Douglas wrote: > Why not just start a new master based off 2.0, and remove the 2.0 > branch? It does not look like the current master branch will get much > adoption, and this would make weld consistent with pretty much every > other JBoss project. > Stuart > > Jozef Hartinger wrote: >> Team, >> >> there are currently three main branches for Weld Core: >> >> - 1.1 - the Weld 1.1 branch used in JBoss AS 7, JBoss EAP and other EE6 >> application servers >> - master - Weld 1.2 - basically the 1.1 branch with weld-osgi on top >> - 2.0 - Weld 2.0 (CDI 1.1 implementation) >> >> This is confusing as git users usually expect to find the latest and >> greatest in the master branch which is not the case for Weld. Therefore, >> I am going to rename the master branch to a more appropriate name - >> "1.2". If you do any work on the current master branch make sure to >> apply your changes to "1.2" from now on. >> >> A new master branch will be added eventually when we start working on >> Weld 2.1. In the meantime there will be no branch named "master". >> >> Jozef >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
