Weld supports it but because of the reasons stated by Mark I would 
recommend avoiding it.

On 11/22/2013 08:19 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi Bill!
>
> This pops up quite often.
> Actually the spec is pretty much silent on this and defines nothing else than 
> CDI being based on JSR-330. But the TCK defines that any JSR-299 container 
> also must fully pass the JSR-330 TCK as part of the compatibility check.
>
> Means CDI containers need to support it, but it is not really defined how it 
> should behave.
> In OWB we just treat it as alias for @ApplicationScoped. I'm not 100% sure if 
> it's the same for Weld, but I think to remember discussing about it with 
> either Jozef or Pete that they do it effectively the same way. Needs ack from 
> them though.
>
> My personal suggestion is to avoid it.
>
> There is a slightly broader issue hidden in this topic actually.
> As per explanation above, each CDI container must also support scopes 
> annotated with @Scope (from atinject, not @NormalScope from CDI). But 
> atinject does nowhere define how to register Contexts for those scopes. In 
> CDI we should do pickup contexts for those scopes but it's probably not well 
> tested nor defined how those contexts should behave.
> I'd personally would expect them to just get injected without the Contextual 
> Reference proxies but as direct Contextual Instances and otherwise be pretty 
> much the same like standard CDI scopes. But that needs ack + wordig by my 
> fellow CDI EG members.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Bill Burke <bbu...@redhat.com>
>> To: Weld <weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Friday, 22 November 2013, 3:17
>> Subject: [weld-dev] CDI and @Singleton
>>
>> Is Weld or CDI supposed to recognize and support @javax.inject.Singleton
>> annotated classes?
>>
>> -- 
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

Reply via email to