Thank you Jozef! I also figured this out after I debugged the case further and reread the javadoc. Would you recommend to create one bda for every given class (not app class) or we should design a special archive to hold all this kind of classes or it does not matter much?
As for adding the bda to the graph, from my understanding, these classes should be visible to every other classes in the deployment. Therefore, this new bda should be accessible to all other bdas in this deployment, right? Thanks Emily On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Jozef Hartinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Emily, > > see the JavaDoc here: > http://docs.jboss.org/weld/javadoc/2.2/weld-spi/org/jboss/weld/bootstrap/spi/Deployment.html#loadBeanDeploymentArchive-java.lang.Class > - > > Specifically, it says: > > " If the deployment archive containing the given class is not currently a > bean deployment archive, it must be added to the bean deployment archive > graph and returned." > > Therefore, even though the given class is not part of an existing bean > archive, it should be handled by the integrator, added to the bean archive > graph and returned from the method. > > HTH, > > Jozef > > > On 05/24/2015 09:58 AM, Emily Jiang wrote: > > I'm trying to run the cdi tck but got an error for the following test: > In the test: > org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.definition.bean.custom.CustomBeanImplementationTest > Method: arquillianBeforeClass > > > > Caused by: org.jboss.weld.exceptions.IllegalStateException: WELD-000817: > Unable to find Bean Deployment Archive for class java.lang.Integer > at > org.jboss.weld.util.DeploymentStructures.getOrCreateBeanDeployment(DeploymentStructures.java:39) > at > org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.events.AbstractBeanDiscoveryEvent.getOrCreateBeanDeployment(AbstractBeanDiscoveryEvent.java:70) > at > org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.events.AfterBeanDiscoveryImpl.processBean(AfterBeanDiscoveryImpl.java:86) > at > org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.events.AfterBeanDiscoveryImpl.finish(AfterBeanDiscoveryImpl.java:186) > ... 15 more > > It seems that Custom bean was added by an extension but the bean > implements Bean<Integer>. Surely the java.lang.Interger should not be any > bean archives. Can someone tell me what I might done wrong? Will integrator > need to do something to cater for all of the java.x classes or Weld should > handle this? > > -- > Thanks > Emily > ================= > Emily Jiang > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing > [email protected]https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > > > -- Thanks Emily ================= Emily Jiang [email protected]
_______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
