doh. You were right that the OWB-616 was for a different issue rather than the one I am interested.
Do you have any suggestions about working around the unproxiable Hashtable issue? On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Martin Kouba <[email protected]> wrote: > Dne 21.10.2015 v 13:20 Emily Jiang napsal(a): > >> Thanks Martin! >> The new final method on the Hashtable is >> >> final boolean initHashSeedAsNeeded(int capacity) >> > > I see. This package-private method was added in JDK7. > > >> The change went as part of the following bug fix: >> >> [1] http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006593 >> >> As for the OWB-616 jira, I did not look at the actual fix, but I assume >> the fix by the following comments. I might be wrong here. >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-616#> >> Mark Struberg >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=struberg> >> added a comment - 01/Oct/11 19:12 >> >> I now changed the checks to allow private final and public/protected >> static final methods. >> > > Mark does not talk about non-static package-private methods, right? He > talks about private final and public/protected static final => should work > in Weld too. > > If non-static package-private methods are allowed than the spec is > violated. Unfortunately, it seems there's no tck test for this. > > >> >> Thanks >> >> Emily >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Martin Kouba <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Emily, >> >> commments inline. >> >> Dne 21.10.2015 v 11:02 Emily Jiang napsal(a): >> >> CDI specification does not allow proxying a class with >> non-private final >> methods. The java.util.Hashtable class has a >> non-private final method added to the class in later versions >> of Java, so a CDI application that previously worked may break >> when updating the Java level. >> >> >> Just for the record: what's the name of the method? >> >> >> This issue was logged in CDI-527. >> >> OpenWebBeans fixed this via the jira >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-616). >> >> >> OWB-616 does not fix CDI-527 but CDI-159, i.e. a private final >> method does not cause a deployment problem. This works in Weld too. >> On the other hand, CDI-527 is still an open issue so we can't simply >> fix it. In theory, we could add a new feature of a non-portable >> mode. But non-portable mode is not intended to be commonly used. >> It's kind of a workaround. >> >> >> Can Weld fix this in the 2.3 or 2.2 trunk? >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> Emily >> ================= >> Emily Jiang >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >> >> >> -- >> Martin Kouba >> Software Engineer >> Red Hat, Czech Republic >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> Emily >> ================= >> Emily Jiang >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > -- > Martin Kouba > Software Engineer > Red Hat, Czech Republic > -- Thanks Emily ================= Emily Jiang [email protected]
_______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
