Hi, thanks for your report and for the reproducer. We will take a look at it and get back to you soon.
As for WELD-2092, that cannot be the cause of this behaviour because it was added in Alpha15 and your reproducer breaks with Alpha14 already. Matej ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Larry Streepy" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 12:36:35 AM > Subject: [weld-dev] Example project to show private observer failure with > decorator > > > > The attached project (maven and intellij) exhibits the problem with private > observer methods when an App scoped bean is decorated. > > > > You can rung it from IJ, or from the command line using: mvn compile > exec:java -Dexec.mainClass=Main > > > > As delivered, you should see output like the following: > > > > doSomething decorator, > delegate=org.jboss.weld.proxies.AppScopeBean$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass@4550bb58 > > doSomething, > this=org.jboss.weld.proxies.AppScopeBean$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass@4550bb58 , > anInt=5 > > Got event, > this=org.jboss.weld.proxies.AppScopeBean$Proxy$_$$_Weld$Proxy$@49139829 <= > should be org.jboss.weld.proxies.AppScopeBean$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass > > Got event, anInt=0 <= should be 5 > > > > Note the “anInt=0” where it should be 5. If you change AppScopeBean#observer > from ‘private’ to ‘protected’ you will see output like this: > > > > doSomething decorator, > delegate=org.jboss.weld.proxies.AppScopeBean$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass@4550bb58 > > doSomething, > this=org.jboss.weld.proxies.AppScopeBean$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass@4550bb58 , > anInt=5 > > Got event, > this=org.jboss.weld.proxies.AppScopeBean$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass@4550bb58 <= > should be org.jboss.weld.proxies.AppScopeBean$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass > > Got event, anInt=5 <= should be 5 > > > > Note that in the latter case, the member variable is properly initialized. > The problem stems from the fact that the proxy implementation doesn’t > include the private methods. I think that the changes included in > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-2092 have broken decorated beans with > private observer methods. It also hinders tests that use things like JMockit > Deencapsulation to invoke private methods on bean instances. > > > > I don’t know how this all reconciles with the CDI spec, but the current > implementation seems broken if I can’t have a private observer method simply > because the class is the target of a Decorator. > > > > Thanks for taking the time to review this post. > > > > Larry. > > > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
