[
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/CDI-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559614#action_12559614
]
Pete Muir commented on CDI-17:
------------------------------
We will be switching back to notifyObserver for the next release. Fixing the
java api to match the spec will be considered as part of the CDI MR.
> Change name of the @Observes Reception attribute to "notified"
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-17
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/CDI-17
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Javadoc and API
> Affects Versions: 1.0
> Reporter: Dan Allen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> As of the CDI 1.0 specification, the name of the Reception attribute on
> @Observes is "receive". The patch release of the API (SP1) changes the name
> to "notifyObserver", so a change is already being considered. Therefore, I'd
> like to suggest a better name that would read more fluently. That name is
> "notified".
> Let us compare the three cases:
> 1. @Observes(receive = IF_EXISTS)
> 2. @Observes(notifyObserver = IF_EXISTS)
> 3. @Observes(notified = IF_EXISTS)
> Of the three, notifyObserver breaks the flow of the sentence the most. On the
> other hand, notified reads nicely, including with the TransactionPhase
> attribute included:
> @Observes(notified = IF_EXISTS, during = TransactionPhase.AFTER_SUCCESS)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
weld-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
