[ 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pete Muir updated CDI-37:
-------------------------

    Affects Version/s: 1.0


> Stateless scope
> ---------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-37
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-37
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>            Reporter: Adam Warski
>
> From a discussion on weld-dev 
> (http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/2011-January/002825.html):
> Here's my use-case:
> I have some beans which are inherently stateless, e.g. "services" or factory 
> methods. The only fields they have are injected. I am using these beans in 
> normal-scoped passivation-capable beans, e.g. session or conversation scoped. 
> In such case, they also have to be passivation-capable, which means either
> (a) be normal-scoped (proxyable)
> (b) implement Serializable and leave the bean dependent-scoped
> If I go with (a) this means that I'd have to put my bean in the request, 
> session, conversation or application scope. However none of these choices 
> make much sense, as they indicate the my beans holds 
> request/session/etc-scoped data - which it doesn't, as it is stateless.
> So I am left with (b) - implement Serializable + dependent scope. But is that 
> the right thing to do always? Firstly, if I have a lot of such stateless 
> beans, which are injected one into another, serializing a simple 
> session-scope bean may mean that half the beans in my application get 
> serialized. Secondly, a developer looking at such a bean could wonder why is 
> this bean serializable? Esp if it doesn't have any state?
> Hence what I'd like in fact is a proxyable scope (normal), which on 
> serialization would only write the proxy information, on de-serialization 
> would inject a new instance of the bean (or from a pool), and on injection 
> would either behave as dependent (new instance), or take beans from a pool. 
> Just as the EJB Stateless scope (except that I don't want to make my bean an 
> EJB).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
_______________________________________________
weld-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

Reply via email to