ProcessSessionBeanTest testProcessSessionBeanEvent count
--------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: CDITCK-215
                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-215
             Project: CDI TCK
          Issue Type: Bug
      Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
    Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
            Reporter: David Blevins


[Side note maybe there should be versions for 1.0.4.SP1 and  1.0.4.SP2]

Test: 
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.extensions.processBean.ProcessSessionBeanTest.testProcessSessionBeanEvent

Not sure if this is an issue or not, so filling this as a bug and not a 
challenge.  The test essentially has two observer methods and is asserting that 
only one of them are called.

  public void observeElephantSessionBean(@Observes ProcessSessionBean<Elephant> 
event)
  {
     ProcessBeanObserver.elephantProcessSessionBean = event;
  }

  public void observeElephantBean(@Observes ProcessBean<Elephant> event)
  {
     ProcessBeanObserver.elephantProcessBeanCount++;
  }

Specifically the test asserts that observeElephantSessionBean is called and 
that observeElephantBean is not called.

Currently we call both because ProcessSessionBean is assignable to ProcessBean 
and the generics are the same.

Is there a part of the spec that mandates only the most specific observer 
method is called?

The only thing I can find is in 10.4 which says pretty clearly:

  There may be arbitrarily many observer methods with the same event parameter 
type and qualifiers.
  A bean (or extension) may declare multiple observer methods.

Well I guess it's not that clear as it says essentially "this may happen" 
rather than "this may happen...and when it does the behavior is...[all are 
invoked || only the most specific is invoked]"


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
_______________________________________________
weld-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

Reply via email to