[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12672517#comment-12672517
]
Marko Lukša commented on WELD-999:
----------------------------------
Actually, it's not broken. I have added another test - one that actually
invokes an intercepted method and checks if both interceptors were invoked. The
test passes.
So the actual problem is only with
{{BeanManager.resolveInterceptors(InterceptionType type, Annotation...
interceptorBindings)}}.
In weld-core, the {{interceptorBindings}} parameter is always flattened
({{AbstractClassBean.flattenInterceptorBindings()}}) before being passed to the
method.
In {{InterceptorBindingTransitivityTest}} however, {{resolveInterceptors()}} is
called without flattening interceptor bindings first (e.g.
{{resolveInterceptors(InterceptionType.AROUND_INVOKE, new
UltraSynchronizedLiteral())}}.
So the real question is whether {{BeanManager.resolveInterceptors()}} should
flatten the interceptorBindings itself or whether the caller should to this.
> Interceptor binding transitivity broken
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: WELD-999
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-999
> Project: Weld
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Interceptors and Decorators
> Affects Versions: 1.1.2.Final
> Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
> Assignee: Marko Lukša
> Fix For: 1.2.0.Beta1
>
>
> See
> org.jboss.weld.tests.interceptors.binding.transitivity.InterceptorBindingTransitivityTest
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
weld-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
