[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2184) Consider clarification/improvement of EjbServices contract

[Martin Kouba (JIRA)]

Title: Message Title

Martin Kouba updated an issue   Weld / WELD-2184 Consider clarification/improvement of EjbServices contract Change By: Martin Kouba Right now, it's not explicitly defined whether {{EjbDescriptor}} instances passed to {{resolveEjb()}} and {{registerInterceptors()}} are of the same implementation as provided by {{BeanDeploymentArchive.getEjbs()}}. Some integrators expect to receive the same instances as provided. However, internally an {{EjbDescriptor}} wrapper is used. And  it seems  for {{resolveEjb()}} a delegate is always passed (see also {{SessionBean.createReference()}}) but for {{registerInterceptors()}} the internal wrapper is passed.  I believe we should pass the delegate for both of the methods  to be more consistent .  I'm not so sure about the clarification, i.e. whether an integrator   We  should  only work with  also consider improving the  {{ EjbDescriptor EjbServices }} contract  or not  so that it's easier to use . Add Comment   This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026-sha1:78f6ec4)

_______________________________________________
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues