Daniel Martin wrote:
2006/1/4, pat cito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But wengo uses Qt4/C++ and it does support all this(thread, mutex,
stringlist, delegates, xml parsing, http, serialization ect...) , right?
Right. Qt4 is a great bunch of libraries so i don't really understand
the point why there is a need to re-invent?
This was one of the mistake with classic: Qt everywhere.
It's very dangerous to be dependant on a huge graphical library like Qt.
If you want to port it to other platforms like windows CE it's impossible.
The Firefox plugin (not yet released but works pretty fine) is developed
using NG has a dll. It is just a graphical interface like another one.
Would have this been possible if Qt was a dependance?
NG is Qt independant: you can developed a GTK+ interface or whatever you
prefer. One can imagine to have a nice GNOME or KDE integration, a MFC
interface, a gui specially made for advanced users or for my grandma.
I prefer the Boost approach: a lot of (very) small and simple libraries
that can be used independently (yeah I know Qt4 solves a bit this
problem) + Boost is real C++ and does not use the preprocessor.
check http://www.boost.org
This does not mean that I am a big fan of Qt: I still love Qt simply
because it's the greatest graphical library I ever used.
--
Tanguy Krotoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dev.openwengo.com
_______________________________________________
Wengophone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://dev.openwengo.com/mailman/listinfo/wengophone-devel
