On 3/1/06, Adrien (OpenWengo) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem, IMHO, is that Wikipedia contributors think OpenWengo and WengoPhone are not significant enough to have an article of their own.
Regards,I think we should have:
ONE article on "Wengo" - describes the company, mentions the softaware and the project.
ONE article on "WengoPhone" describes classic for now, and NG later. Explains it is produced with help from the OpenWengo community, has link to openwengo.org
finally, the "OpenWengo" entry should route to "WengoPhone" - that could be changed if and when we release non-wengophone projects.
The problem, IMHO, is that Wikipedia contributors think OpenWengo and WengoPhone are not significant enough to have an article of their own.
--
Julien Gilli
_______________________________________________ Wengophone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://dev.openwengo.com/mailman/listinfo/wengophone-devel
