Follow-up Comment #6, patch #1302 (project wesnoth):
Alright, here's a new version of the patch. This version uses the algorithm
from the code (I haven't tested versus an in-game screenshot becasue ToD
issues make that difficult, and 'cause I'm lazy, but I've tested the script
and it produces reasonable-looking results). This version also has a
luminance- rather than average-based method thrown in (activated by the '-l'
flag), mainly out of curiosity on my part. The new method is actually much
worse than the old one in practice, but I figure it's worth it to leave
around so that others curious about it can see that it doesn't work. I still
suspect that a *slightly* weighted average might produce "better" results
perceptually, but I don't think that it would actually be noticeable, and I'm
not about to push for changes.
Of course, this new version is also against the latest svn.
(file #6786)
_______________________________________________________
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: PythonTCupgrade.patch Size:13 KB
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/patch/?1302>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-bugs
