URL:
  <http://gna.org/bugs/?14535>

                 Summary: minor glitches in Delfador's Memoirs (Mage Magister
& Garard)
                 Project: Battle for Wesnoth
            Submitted by: vaxquis
            Submitted on: Friday 10/16/2009 at 18:56
                Category: Bug
                Severity: 2 - Minor
                Priority: 5 - Normal
              Item Group: Campaign
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
                 Release: 1.7 branch (1.7.6)
        Operating System: any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

two things caught my eyes here:

a) Mage Magister (lev 4 Delfador) has exactly the same melee attack as Mage
Commander (lev 3 Delfador), with the same description, relating its strength
to Arch Mage (lev 3) unit - resulting with -3 attack strength modifier in
relation with the base unit, instead of -1 used for both lev 2 (described
"Slightly weaker") and lev 3 ("one less than arch mage");
at the same time, Mage Magister has a note "add fire resistance", but he has
fire resistance *substracted* instead (base res for this unit, derived from
Great Mage, is 70 [=30% res], while this 'added' resistance sets it to 80
[=20% res]);

b) the "King Garard II" unit is portrayed as
        type=King of Wesnoth
        id=Garard
        name=_ "Garard"
in the '05_council_in_weldyn.cfg', using a hand-made "King of Wesnoth" unit
type, designed specially for him, while later on, in '15_save_the_king.cfg',
he turns into
        type=Royal Warrior
        id=Garard II
        name=_ "Garard II"
using the common 'Royal Warrior' unit type;
the are both the same in-game person, as Garard I does not take part in the
campaign - quote from '12_terror_at_the_ford_of_parthyn.cfg':
 It is now 470 YW and Garard I died a few months
            # previously. Garard II, the new King, is 30 years old.

these inconsistencies could either be typos or intentional, ambigously
commented features, so i'd be very happy to see any of the campaign
maintaners verifying them as either.





    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://gna.org/bugs/?14535>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-bugs

Reply via email to