Sure, sure. You can use 1a_ and 1b_Scenario_name to do branches. You can
also do stuff like how in Sceptre of Fire I use 2t_ for the talking
scenario following real scenario number 2, and the next scenario is
counted as 3_, even though it is really scenario 4. But the point is
that some kind of ordering is helpful.
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 00:28:09 +0100,
Nils Kneuper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone!
Maybe it would be nice to rename the scenarios in mainline to contain
the "mission number". So the scenario that was before
"rescue_the_world.cfg" would now be "10_rescue_the_world.cfg" since it
was the 10th mission. The main benefits of such a restructuring would
be the following:
Just note that you don't want this to be too rigid. It is possible to
do scenarios in different orders (or not at all) depending on player
choices. So there will be some exceptional cases.
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
