On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:47:36PM +0100, Nils Kneuper wrote: > Hi everyone! > We should really start removing WML that is only left for compatibility > to 1.0.x. > In general we should be a little more strict with depricated WML. At > least we should show a depricated message. Within 3 releases after WML > in some area was changed and old one was declared depricated we should > remove this compatibility. That means if WML (like the new terrain WML) > did change in version 1.3.1, we should remove the compatibility to this > old version three (or maybe two) versions later. In this case when doing > it three versions later, version 1.3.4 would not support the single > letter WML anymore. Of course with this all rcs and stable versions just > count as "one" version since we should not change the accepted WML > syntax within these versions. > In general we should be a lot stricter about depricated WML and removing > compatibility layers since they might clutter parts of the sourcecode. > Comments about this?
One word; agreed! > Greets, > Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
