[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why should we change the de-facto "rating" of Wesnoth to accommodate
> the addition of terms like "tree-shagger"? That would be a case of the
> tail wagging the dog.
We were already at PG-13 in MPAA terms. I was suggesting we adopt ESRB "T"
rather than ESRB "E10+" only to be consistent with the MPAA rating.
Jetryl has already made the case for a consistent PG-13 rating quite
well. I will only add that I think PG-13 is an easier test to apply than
E10+, which is not insignificant as I think wee don't want to spend a lot of
bandwidth on these arguments in the future.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
