On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 02:12:16PM +0200, jeremy rosen wrote: I also would like to add boost and for more things than filesystems only.
> Last, including a new library is a long and delicate process > > * Long: well, with the breakage of the Editor, we can either release > 1.3.3 with a known broken editor or postpone it for long, so if the > breakage is minor, let's release with the known bug and integrate > boost after. If it's long, well, let's admit it and start integrating > right away, knowing that it's going to be long.... I prefer to have the editor fixed before 1.3.3 will be released. Otherwise some people won't have a working editor. > * Delicate: in the past big changes like that, especially the ones > that affect the build system have broken SVN for some quite long > periods, so if we go for it, it might be a good idea to do it on a > separate branch... if only to avoid blocking other developements... I'm not sure a seperate branch will give the test coverage we want. I prefer to make those changes directly in trunk. Also if we want to use more boost libs I think they should have their own test case in the configure script, since some distros (eg Debian) split them in separate libs. > Regard > Boucman Regards, Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
