On 7/28/07, Joseph Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Considering that user-made campaigns are often contributed to by people
> who've also done stuff for mainline, and user-made campaigns have their
> own credits.cfg, it seems to me that if the syntax is changed there will
> have to be some way for a UMC to add to the contributions= list, instead
> of having their own [entry] tags for each person. Or have some way for
> [entry]s to be combined if their id is the same.
>

That could be done if we change to the [entry] format, true - but only
if the UMC authors change to the new format. Which brings up a new
problem, backwards compatibility. Which actually might not be a
problem, [about] simply could look like this:

[about]
title = ...
text = ...
[entry]...[/entry]
[entry]...[/entry]
[/about]

Then, existing [about] sections in UMCs would work just like now,
having a title, and displaying a text. Below the text, all the
[entry]s would then get displayed in order. (Mainline would not use
text= any longer.. or in fact, maybe could be used for some
introductory statement for some sections.)

_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

Reply via email to