Patrick Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> While I'm perfectly capable of maintaining wmllint, I'd rather not start
> adding to my responsibilities. Honestly, I'm surprised you would resort to
> such an ultimatum / threat considering it was your foresight to hedge for
> this likelihood in the first place.
>
> I'm conviced by your argument against version stamping, but still opposed to
> your second point for reasons stated. The gains just don't outweigh the
> disadvantages. I'd rather have a logical discussion about it than to start
> making ultimatums, though. As a long-time WML author I had hoped you'd value
> my input a bit more.
I value your input a lot, actually. But I could see the discussion was going
to turn into a pure value conflict with no logical resolution. Neither of
us has time for that, so I cut to the chase.
Please think of this as showing respect for your time, as well as mine.
I meant it that way.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
