На Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:52:55 +0100
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> wrote:


> Thanks for your contructive attitude.
> What is wrong with using a DSL for a very specific purpose ?
I don't think that cmake's language is a DSL, at least compared to make. 
It's just yet another scripting language, and time used for maintaining
 it could be better spent elsewhere.
Besides, using an existing general purpose language would allow people
using the buildsystem to reuse their existing knowledge, not learn new
language constructs, but only new API.

_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

Reply via email to