i'm fine, go for it... I was also leaving a day to the ML to react if anyone had strong opinions about namespaces, but since that's not the case wb:: will be perfect
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Gabriel Morin <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess the lack of answers mean a collective "I don't give a damn". So, I'm > gonna go ahead with the wb:: namespace provided boucman agrees (he's back > tomorrow). > > 2010/5/31 Gabriel Morin <[email protected]> >> >> Hi all, >> >> To avoid class names like planned_actions_manager_of_doom (almost not >> exaggerated), I'd like to namespace my code. >> >> Does my favorite candidate sounds ok: >> wb:: >> >> Or do the following alternatives sound better: >> whiteboard:: >> plan:: >> planning:: >> >> Planned classes would be for instance: >> wb::action (instead of planned_action) >> wb::move (instead of planned_move) >> wb::attack >> wb::recruit >> wb::manager (instead of planned_move_manager) >> >> Gabba > > > _______________________________________________ > Wesnoth-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev > > _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
