Dear Caleb,
 
Thank you for inviting us to respond to this very important subject regarding 
the institution of Agofe among the Lugbara. Unfortunately, I seem not to have 
read the articles by my elder brothers Mr. Acema and Hon. Dr. Okuonzi or if I 
did, I never paid much attention to them to be able to respond to the specific 
arguments they have made. I will therefore limit my response to their two 
claims that you have alluded to, namely: 1) that those seeking Agofe are self 
seekers, 2) that the Lugbara were egalitarian and believed in equality.
 
In the first place the claim that those seeking Agofe are self seekers without 
providing sufficient evidence is disrespectful to people like Mzee Jason Avutia 
(Chairman, Lugbara Elders' Association) who played crucial role in averting a 
potentially serious armed conflict between National Resistance Army (NRA) and 
the soldiers who had retreated to West Nile and regrouped to resist the NRA 
under the leadership of Brigadier Go Wilson Toko. The soldiers were itching to 
fight but when Toko convened a meeting with the elders from Arua District to 
seek their approval and blessing a war against the advancing NRA, they insisted 
that war was not the best option. Instead the elders offered to go to the front 
line with white flags to negotiate a peaceful entry of NRA into West Nile. As a 
result NRA entered West Nile without a single bullet which saved us from 
bloodshed and destruction of property. Had the elders not intervened and had 
Toko not listened
 to their wise counsel, our situation would have been worst than the suffering 
that the people of Gulu have endured for decades. 
 
It was against such a background that the need for a more structured cultural 
institution among Lugbara elders arose to facilitate coordination and 
mobilization to respond to common challenges and threats. It is important to 
appreciate the historical context in which Agofe evolved to constructively 
discuss its merits and demerits. This is not to say that there can be no self 
seekers in such an organization. Definitely like any organization there will 
always be some individuals who would want to take advantage of such an 
institution to advance their selfish interests at the expense of a common good. 
With time such self seekers and their selfish schemes will be exposed. In my 
view, the question should be how we as young people can build on what the 
elders have done but not to tear it down for equally selfish reasons. We should 
be discussing how we can make the Agofe more democratic, transparent, and all 
inclusive. The constitution of Uganda
 recognizes cultural institutions as legitimate institutions to play 
complementary roles in promoting unity and service delivery. The Agofe can play 
an important role in resolving conflicts and fostering unity, preserving our 
institution memory through artifacts, promoting our cultural identity, 
promoting tourism,  developing language etc.
 
While I agree with Acema and Okuonzi that the Lugbara were generally viewed as 
an egalitarian society by the dawn of colonialism, I do not subscribe to the 
notion that social formation among the Lugbara communities was static and the 
institutions of leadership would not have grown beyond clans. In fact to the 
contrary, colonialism came in as a disruption to state formation among 
communities of West Nile as Ahluwalia (1995) and Leopold (2005) accurately 
describe in their books entitled "Plantation and the Politics of Sugar in 
Uganda" and "Inside West Nile" respectively which I encourage those interested 
in the history of our people to read. Copies of these books can be found in 
Aristock Bookshop in Kampala. Our challenge is that we have a poor reading 
culture which limits our ability to objectively examine documentary evidence to 
make plausible arguments. 
 
I would like to conclude by suggesting that the executive of this forum should 
consider organizing an event in form of a workshop or a conference in which 
people with strong views about the notion of Agofe can be invited to present 
alternative views based on research evidence. I would be willing to offer my 
own perspective to the discussions.
 
Thanks.
 
Sam
 
 

 Subject: [WestNileNet] Do the Lugbara need a traditional Chief
 

Some time ago, Ambassador Achema Harold, opined in one of the dailies that 
those seeking Agofe are self seekers, that the Lugbara were egalitarian and 
believed in equality. Hon Dr. Okuonzi MP Vura rebutted the same, and supported 
the idea, it is not the most pressing issue we have, Sam Andema and father 
Ruffino and others what is your take on this matter. 

Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
WestNileNet mailing list
[email protected]
http://orion.kym.net/mailman/listinfo/westnilenet

WestNileNet is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
WestNileNet mailing list
[email protected]
http://orion.kym.net/mailman/listinfo/westnilenet

WestNileNet is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to