Jan Prikryl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Whoa, wait a minute. Doesn't this assume the user has control over
> > both master and slave site? Of course that is wrong for many of us.
>
> Many sites that run anonymous FTP allow anonymous rsync access as
> well. But in principle you are right - a site that offers FTP access
> doees not have to be necesarilly accessible via rsync.
Is that really widespread? I haven't noticed that to be true. My
usage is admittedly limited and more home user oriented, but my
feeling was that it is fairly rare. Do big servers like metlab or
cdrom.com etc routinely allow rsync?
>
> > I would think the full mirroring capability would be a fairly
> > important addition.
>
> Right.
Anyone working on that particular aspect?
