[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I don't know about Heiko, but I got the sources from the CVS shortly after
> he posted his "windows, continue bug" message to the list.
And yet the http.c code you showed looked different from what I
assumed was the latest version.
> It seems to me that your "fix" doesn't work.
It wasn't supposed to fix the problem you had; it was a minor
optimization.
In the meantime I believe I found and fixed the real problem; updating
to the latest CVS sources should fix the problem Heiko was seeing.
