Re: xhtml? Re: Standalone html parser

[Anees Shaikh]

> 
> Actually, I'd like to point out that the "<img />" part is valid XHTML,
> which is a W3C recommendation. And thus I believe should be supported by
> wget if it isn't already? 

Thanks to Henrik and Hrvoje for pointing this out.  I had only
consulted the HTML 4.01 spec before posting.

Hrvoje, you mentioned that you planned to modify the parser to handle
these tags.  Any ideas on timetable?

-- Anees