Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This subject says it all. The leak is minor, the fix could be made > something like this:
What memory leak are you referring to in the subject? Your patch replaces an assert() with a return NULL. The only way that assert() could be tripped is by having a line begin with \0 (which I didn't think of when I was writing the code; I was guarding against an "impossible" condition to protect the logic of the code.)
