On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:20:38PM -0800, Partycrew Industries wrote: >I might be wrong but I believe there is a bug in the >--timeout=whatever syntax. I just can't get the >program to obey it under any circumstances, I put in
No, that is not a correct statement. The program obeys the timeout under *most* circumstances. You can't get it to work for timing out a socket connection, because that is a bit of code that hasn't been implemented yet. If no one else wants to, I can work up a patch for this next week. It's pretty standard coding, right out of Stevens. ;) Some friendly advice about submitting good problem reports: Your initial statement was, in fact, false. Stick to the facts. It would have been a much better bug report if that second sentence had been omitted. Cc: changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Alan Eldridge "Dave's not here, man."
