>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Andre Majorel wrote: >> > The moderators are informed about each message that awaits > >> moderation; that alert would contain a URL they can visit and > >> approve or reject the mail, at their discretion. >> >> The web interface is not necessary. Listar, for instance, just >> forwards the dubious mails to the moderator. Approving the message >> is done by replying to listar (actually forwarding to >> somelist-repost@somedomain, but you get the idea). Daniel> The benefit from using a web interface would be to have one Daniel> single queue that multiple admins can work on. ezmlm supports that out-of-the-box, but with a mail interface. There will not be sent a duplicate, if a message is approved several times. Anyway - spamassassin is now in place - let's give it a chance before doing radical movements - and I can assure, that ezmlm is far more mature and stable than Mailman - we (sunsite) have been running both systems for years, and there is no doubt about, which type we recommends! Karsten
