Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > If your point is that Wget should print a warning when it can *prove* > that the Content-Length data it received was faulty, as in the case of > having received more data, I agree. We're already printing a similar > warning when Last-Modified is invalid, for example.
I'm afraid you'll have to ask R. Fielding, J. Gettye, J. Mogul, H. Frystyk, and T. Berners-Lee what they were thinking. <grin> I was just quoting from RFC 2068: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1 As for printing a warning only when wget can "prove" that the Content-Length data was faulty, sounds like a reasonable implementation to me. Tony
