"Simons, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe 1.8 was an rpm install, but I could be mistaken. You are > right about the 1.9 install .. it was just a config/make/make > install on the tar I nabbed. How can I determine if I have SSL > includes on a RH9 box?
I think you need to install the openssl-devel package. > Could that be causing the server response --> file issue i'm > experiencing? Not really; the person who prepared the RPM obviously had the proper includes, or the resulting executable wouldn't have been SSL-enabled. The reason I asked you to try the latest version is in the hope that the problem might have gone away.
