Hi Heiko!

> > Until now, I linked to your main page. 
> > Would you mind if people short-cut this? 
> Linking to the directory is bad since people would download 

Sorry, I meant linking directly to the "latest" zip.
However, I personally prefer to read what the provider 
(in this case you) has to say about a download anyway.


> Do link to the complete url if you prefer to, although I like to keep 
> some stats.

Understood.


> for example since start of the year
> there have been 7 referrals from www.jensroesner.de/wgetgui 

Wow, that's massive... 
...not!
;-)


> Since that is about 0.05% stats shouldn't be 
> altered too much if you link directly to the archive ;-)

Thanks for pointing that out ;-}


> > What do you think about adding a "latest-ssl-libraries.zip"?
> I don't think so.
> If you get the "latest complete wget" archive those are included anyway 
> and you are sure it will work. 

Oh I'm very sorry, must have overread/misunderstood that. 
I thought the "latest" zip would not contain the SSLs.
That's great.


> I'd prefer to not force a unneeded (admittedly, small) download by
bundling 
> the ssl libraries in every package.

Very true.
Especially as wget seems to be used by quite some people on slow
connections.


Kind regards
Jens




-- 
GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...)
jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++

Reply via email to