> You're close.  You forgot the `-u' option to diff (very important),
> and you snipped the beginning of the `patch' output (also important).

Ok, I forgot the -u switch which was stupid as I actually read 
the command line in the patches file :(
But concerning the snipping I just did 
diff .... > file.txt 
so I cannot have snipped anything. Is my shell (win2000) 
doing something wrongly or is the missing bit there now (when using the -u
switch).

Jens

Once more:

Patch sum up:
a) Tell users how to --execute more than one wgetrc command
b) Tell about and link to --execute when listing wgetrc commands.
Reason: Better understanding and navigating the manual

ChangeLog entry:
Changed wget.texi concerning --execute switch to facilitate 
use and user navigation.

Start patch:

--- wget.texi   Sun Nov 09 00:46:32 2003
+++ wget_mod.texi       Sun Feb 08 20:46:07 2004
@@ -406,8 +406,10 @@
 @itemx --execute @var{command}
 Execute @var{command} as if it were a part of @file{.wgetrc}
 (@pxref{Startup File}).  A command thus invoked will be executed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the commands in @file{.wgetrc}, thus taking precedence over
-them.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the commands in @file{.wgetrc}, thus taking precedence over 
+them. If you need to use more than one wgetrc command in your
+command-line, use -e preceeding each.
+
 @end table
 
 @node Logging and Input File Options, Download Options, Basic Startup
Options, Invoking
@@ -2147,8 +2149,9 @@
 integer, or @samp{inf} for infinity, where appropriate.  @var{string}
 values can be any non-empty string.
 
-Most of these commands have command-line equivalents (@pxref{Invoking}),
-though some of the more obscure or rarely used ones do not.
+Most of these commands have command-line equivalents (@pxref{Invoking}).
Any
+wgetrc command can be used in the command-line by using the -e (--execute)
(@pxref{Basic Startup Options}) switch.
+
 
 @table @asis
 @item accept/reject = @var{string} 






-- 
GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...)
jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++

Reply via email to