"Oliver Schulze L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > >>That would be wrong because Wget is supposed to download the URLs in >>the order presented, not in a random order. >> > Its not in random order, its grouped by host and ordered by the > user.
In this case, "random" == "other than that specified by the user" A user who is not aware of what Wget is trying to do would have every reason to consider any such order random, and might not like the reordering. I, for one, don't want the program to know better which URLs I want downloaded first. >>Another solution would be to add a kludge for FTP the way HTTP >>persistent connections are dealt with now. That approach might work >>for a Wget 1.11 if someone is willing to work on it. > > I sugested this aproach because it will be far more easy to add a > new option for enabling the "reuse ftp connection" feature and > groups all URLs from the same host, than implementing a full cache > system. The amount of work is exactly the same.
