Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > you're right, of course. the patch included in attachment should fix > the problem. since the new HTTP code supports Content-Disposition > and delays the decision of the destination filename until it > receives the response header, the best solution i could find to make > -c work is to send a HEAD request to determine the actual > destination filename before resuming download if -c is given. > > please, let me know what you think.
I don't like the additional HEAD request, but I can't think of a better solution.
