-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Tony Godshall wrote: > On 10/10/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My current impression is that this is a useful addition for some limited >> scenarios, but not particularly more useful than --limit-rate already >> is. That's part of what makes it a good candidate as a plugin. > > I guess I don't see how picking a reasonable rate automatically is > less useful then having to know what the maximum upstream bandwidth is > ahead of time.
I never claimed it was less useful. In fact, I said it was more useful. My doubt is as to whether it is _significantly_ more useful. I'm still open, just need more convincing. - -- Micah J. Cowan Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer... http://micah.cowan.name/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHDprc7M8hyUobTrERCHN6AJ4/+GhluN5a4ejkMZJN9dt+tHqM2ACfQ0I9 8LvCCfCaxdvH0PfHWHiN4MQ= =m7+Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
