Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Gisle Vanem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Building with 'DEBUG_MALLOC' reveals some memory leaks that
>> should be plugged IMHO. Recursive d/l has lots more leaks which I didn't
>> address with the following patch (yet).
>
> Note that, technically, those are not leaks in real need of plugging
> because they get called only once, i.e. they do not accumulate
> ("leak") unused memory. Of course, it's still a good idea to remove
> them, if nothing else, then to remove false positives from
> DEBUG_MALLOC builds.I love that valgrind distinguishes these from "unreachable" unfreed memory. -- Micah J. Cowan Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer... http://micah.cowan.name/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
