Scheitel, James wrote: > This is really cool stuff. It would have been nice if it would have > been possible to reach right into WUG and get what I wanted with API, > but doing it through the web service/custom asp pages works well > enough. Maybe they will give us that in a future version. Or direct > integration with .Net? :-)
This is really cool. What I'd like to see is an easy way to create and customize application tests and the like. Something that ran over .NET would be awesome since the work required by the developer is considerably less, and you don't have to pay attention to COM internals, etc. I would imagine the right way to architect this would be to define a base class that extensions must inherit from, and require that some of its methods be overridden to define the interface implementation. The classes would then need to either be dropped in the GAC and registered with WUG, or dropped in the WUG directory. The base class could probably be implemented just as a generic implementation of the existing COM interface spec. The goal here would be to make the WUG application framework really easy to extend. Ipswitch has a great product here, and this would only make it better. -bws Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
