I attended the WhatsUp Gold training class this past Thursday 
and Friday in Austin, TX. and thought I'd share my impressions 
(a.k.a "ramblings") with the list... Let me preface this by 
pointing out that I've been using this product and recommending 
it to many of my clients for years.

Was it worth my Time?
Yes.  I picked up many of the new features in WUG 8.0 (events, 
interface monitoring and mapping, map file format and exporting,
etc), as well as several older features that I hadn't used yet.
The swapping of stories and tips with the other students was 
equally valuable; we had a class of seventeen- one student over 
a full class!

Was it worth the price?
At $750/day, it's more expensive than other technical training 
I've looked at (Microsoft, CompTIA, SUN  and Cisco), which all 
seem to run around $500/day.  If you are planning to renew your 
Service Agreement or purchase another WUG license, use that to 
bargain for better pricing (John, Mary and Traci will probably
kill me for saying that!).  I'd feel better shelling out the 
full $1500 (or even a little more) if they added a third day 
to cover SNMP/RMON, COM and some general Systems/Networking 
Monitoring/Management concepts in detail.

How was the Instructor, Brad Wilkus?
Great- good presentation and delivery, good listening skills, 
and great depth of knowledge about WUG- he loves the product!
Brad is a Consultant based out of Florida; I believe he is 
travelling around the country doing all of these classes, 
which seem to be running about three a month.

How was the facility?
Great- I had thought MicroTek was a small hole-in-the-wall kind 
of training facility.  They're anything but that- very helpful 
staff, clean and spacious facilities, great lunches, and recent 
model PC's that were well configured and ready to go.

How was the material?
The time spent in labs and instructor-led examples were great, 
but the manual blows big time.  Sorry Ipswitch, but this thing 
SUCKS!  The presentation section is 105 pages (single-sided) of 
210 PowerPoint slide printouts; the lab section consists of 66 
pages (again, single-sided) covering 15 labs.  There are also 
small Glossary and Appendix sections.  

My recommendations to improve the course?
   1) Buy some of the Microsoft or SUN official training material 
      and learn by example... 
      - Start by adding a Table of Contents (this makes it much 
        more useful as reference material after class is over).
      - Include additional detail around each slide (refer to the
        Microsoft material for some decent examples).
      - Print it out double sided to reduce the size!
      - Include a section at the very beginning, covering some 
        basic terms around Network (or "Systems") Monitoring (or 
        "Management").  What is the difference between these terms,
        and how does Ipswitch characterize WUG?  I classify it as a 
        Systems Monitoring tool, but what do I know? ;)
    2) Establish a model or framework for understanding this whole
       Network/Systems Monitoring/Management space- a discussion 
       on the ISO FCAPS Management model would be a great start,
       followed by an outline of how monitoring capabilities of
       increasing complexity build on each other (this allows us 
       to compare various products capabilities to each other); 
       I show clients something like this (higher capabilities 
       are only found in more expensive products):
             App Response times (not really supported in WUG)
             Processes/Daemons/NT Services
             Multiple network interface handling
             SNMP Metrics and Traps
             TCP/UDP Scripting
             TCP/UDP Port scan (well known services and custom)
             Network (ICMP PING)
    3) More information on integrating additional tools.  The MRTG
       lab was OK, but missed several key pieces, such as the use 
       of wperl.exe instead of perl.exe, use of indexmaker, and how 
       to imbed html tags in the info field of various objects so 
       that MRTG graphs show up in the WUG web interface.  
       Expand this to include a brief overview on using/integrating 
       many of the tools we SysAdmins rely on; RRDTool, VNC, Cisco 
       Works, MS Terminal Services, APC PowerChute Plus, X Browser,
       Dell OpenManage, Compaq Insight Manager, etc...
    4) Point out that extending WUG occurs in one of three ways; 
       modifying the double-click action, adding actions to the 
       right-click or 'context' menu, or via the COM extensions.
    5) The flow of topics could also be improved; it was OK, but 
       it was missing an overview of the WUG interface, and jumped 
       back and forth between configuration and monitoring concepts
       the entire time.
    6) Include some solid HW requirement guidelines (not minimum 
       recommendations) for monitoring X devices.  I know this is a 
       complex issue, but you guys are the experts, right?
    7) Establish some sort of metrics on what to expect in terms of 
       bandwidth impact during initial discovery vs. continuous 
       scanning (what protocols are used, size of packets, basic 
       calculations, etc).

As for what I'd like to see added to the product...
   1) Web interface using authentication against AD/NT/LDAP/NIS/etc.
   2) Metrics can now be queried via ODBC; why not actually storing
      the metrics and maps via ODBC?
   3) The reports (performance, outage, response) suffer from bad 
      fonts and look like crap (sorry, this might be entirely my
      personal preference).  Consider replacing/supplementing these 
      with what many of us are doing with MRTG/RRDTool.  If Somix 
      ever removes that ridiculous Apache requirement from Denika
      (yes, we all know how to pronounce that now), maybe more of 
      us will go that route.
   4) Make running WUG as a service an easier task, and fix that 
      bug where it sometimes refuses to stop running (when in its 
      'service' mode).
   5) Allow dependencies between items located in different maps, 
      without having to create separate objects for the same item 
      (which can cause double-notifications and other weirdness).
   6) Allow right-click menu items to be defined for entire device 
      types (such as 'browse shares' for all NT Server devices).
   7) Give us some useful icons for various common equipment (Cisco, 
      Dell, Compaq, 3COM, Intel, etc)..  The BekArts and CiscoWorks
      collections are nice, but somewhat limited, and I don't have 
      time to import a bunch from Visio, much less create my own.
   8) When WUG moves from being a "monitoring" tool to a full 
      "management" tool, I'll have a million other requests!!

I know several of the other students had ideas on improving both 
the course and the product (I may have even 'borrowed' several of 
their ideas in this ramble); I'd love to hear feedback from others 
who have taken the class!

Jeez, maybe I should spend less time on email, and just go write an 
O'Reilly book on Network Management, I mean Systems Monitoring... 
whatever. :)

Sincerely,
  
Eric Osterholm, MCP, MCSA, MCSE (and MCT Soon!)
Senior Consultant, Collective Technologies
Principle Consultant, Dell Professional Services
home:    (512) 443-7720      cell:    (512) 694-9364
office:  (512) 728-6368      efax:    (413) 622-8179
website: www.osterholm.org   email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]         
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Y!:      EricOsterholm       ICQ:     39640403 -or- 124795824 
AIM:     OsterholmTX         MSN:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to